Self-interest and Universal Health Care: Why Well-insured Americans Should Support Coverage for Everyone
I'm covered - why should I foot the bill for somebody who isn't? This question, unspoken but simmering at the center of the debate over universal health care coverage, comes in for a thoughtful hearing - and, perhaps, gentle corrective - in Larry Churchill's timely book. Churchill, whose Rationing Health Care in America put the nation's health care crisis into perspective here does the same for our crisis of conscience over health care coverage. As Clinton and Congress spar over the financing and organization of a national health care system, the true debate, this book reveals, is about moral and political values, about the meaning and ethics of health care reform.
Churchill begins by cutting through the confused discussion about rationing health care. Concerns about rationing, with all the moral and political questions they raise, deflect our attention from a more important issue, which this book brings into focus. Arguing that care is already rationed by ability to pay, Churchill suggests that the proper question is not whether to ration but how to do so fairly, and that answering requires a clear sense of the aims of a health care system. In pursuit of this necessary understanding, Churchill explores values and concepts such as security and solidarity, self-interest and social affinity, rights and responsibilities. Drawing on philosophical ideas of justice and individual responsibility, rendered here with remarkable clarity, he shows that universal care is morally as well as economically comprehensible and that a truly inclusive health care system should be seen as a common civic purpose rather than as a supply of services to be consumed. Accessible, deeply felt, and cogently argued, this book should revise the terms of the national debate over health care reform.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Security and Solidarity
A Humean Contract
Affinity and Solidarity Getting from Xto We_
access to health achieve Adam Smith affinity age-rationing aims allocation American approach argue arguments atomism atomistic basic Behavior Model benefits benevolence Chapter choices citizen ethic citizenship civic common costs David Hume defined disease Dworkin economic egalitarian theories elderly entitlements equity example financing genetic health care needs health care reform health care services health care system health insurance health policy health services health status hospital human nature Hume's Humean Ibid ideal important individual inequalities interest John Rawls Lester Thurow libertarian limits means Michael Walzer National Health Norman Daniels notion one's patients percent persons philosophy physicians political principle problems programs prudent purpose question rationing Rawls recognized require Response Model right to health rights and responsibilities security and solidarity self-interest sense social social atomism society sympathy theories of justice thinking tion U.S. health uninsured universal health University Press utilitarian W. D. Ross well-insured York