Senator from Texas: Hearings Before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Privileges and Elections, United States Senate, Sixth-eighth Congress, First[-second] Session, Pursuant to S. Res. 97, Authorizing the Investigation of Alleged Unlawful Practices in the Election of a Senator from Texas. December 8, 1924, Volumes 1-3
United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Privileges and Elections. Subcommittee on Senate Resolution 97
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1924 - Elections
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
amount answer Austin believe called campaign candidate CHAIRMAN charge CLARK commission committee conference connection contributions conversation copy counsel County court Dallas deposition discussed Doctor Evans Earle election evidence examination expenses fact filed follows funds FURNEY gave give Graham grand HARWOOD headquarters hearing Henry Hotel HUNTER imperial interest Judge July KEELING klan knew Ku-Klux Klan letter LITTLEJOHN manager matter Mayfield McCORD McLEAN McNAMARA McQUINN mean meeting never NICKELS objection organization paid person position present primary printed province question railroad raise recall received record referred remember Senator King Senator Mayfield Senator NEELY Senator Watson sent signed spent statement STRAUGHAN talk tell testified testimony Texas thing tion told Townes understand United States Senator VALKENBURG Wichita witness ZUMBRUNN
Page 584 - If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten or intimidate any citizen in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States...
Page 639 - ... any case of conspiracy set forth in this section, if one or more persons engaged therein do, or cause to be done, any act in furtherance of the object of such conspiracy, whereby another is injured in his person or property, or deprived of having and exercising any right or privilege of a citizen of the United States, the party so injured or deprived may have an action for the recovery of damages occasioned by such injury or deprivation, against any one or more of the conspirators.
Page 629 - ... by the trustees of the internal improvement fund of the State of Florida.
Page 639 - Wherever the interstate and intrastate transactions of carriers are so related that the government of the one involves the control of the other, it is Congress, and not the State, that is entitled to prescribe the final and dominant rule, for otherwise Congress would be denied the exercise of its constitutional authority, and the State, and not the Nation, would be supreme within the national field.
Page 584 - Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such inhabitant being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined not more than $1,000 or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if death results shall be subject to imprisonment for any term of years or for life.
Page 584 - Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress.
Page 584 - District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution and laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such inhabitant being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined not more than $1,000 or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
Page 639 - If two or more persons in any state or territory conspire, or go in disguise on the highway or on the premises of another, for the purpose of depriving, either directly or indirectly, any person or class of persons of the equal protection Opinion of the Court. of the laws, or of equal privileges and immunities under the laws...
Page 529 - If the statute expressly declares any particular act to be essential to the validity of the election, or that Its omission shall render the election void, all courts whose duty it Is to enforce such statute must so hold, whether the particular act hi question goes to the merits, or affects the result, of the election, or not.