Sexual Shakespeare: Forgery, Authorship, Portraiture
Shakespeare's sexuality has always been an ambiguous concept, despite the pleasant fictions of Shakespeare in Love. Now Michael Keevak examines such sources as anecdotes, imitations, forgeries, spurious works and portraits to show that this ambiguity has a long and twisted history.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
actually addressed already appears argued authentic Bacon bard become beginning biographical called castrated century Chalmers Chandos chapter cited claim Confessions contemporary criticism cultural dark lady Davenant described discussion Droeshout early edition eighteenth Elizabethan English engraving eunuchs evidence example face fact figure Folio forgeries gender hair hand head homosexual idea included Inquiry interested Ireland John kind letter London look male Malone Malone's Marlowe master mentioned merely nature never notes once Oxford painting particular Passionate perhaps person plays poems poet portrait possible problem published queen question readers reading references remarks Renaissance Rollins Samuel Schoenbaum seems sense sexual Shakespeare in Love Shakespeare's Lives simply sodomy sonnets story Stratford studies suggestiveness theory thing University Press Venus Venus and Adonis William Henry William Shakespeare woman women wonder written York young
The World of Shakespeare's Sonnets: An Introduction
Snippet view - 2008