Sexual harassment: a debate
The question of what constitutes sexual harassment is contentious, as is the question of how to address sexual harassment. In this uncompromising yet respectful debate, two philosophers of widely divergent views present clear arguments and then respond directly to each other's reasoning.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Why the Fight against Sexual Harassment Is Misguided
2 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
abuse accused adultery African American alleged harasser Anita Hill argue argument basis of sex behavior believe Camille Paglia campus Catharine MacKinnon characterization of sexual claimant claims Clarence Thomas complaints concept of sexual context courts cultural Demarcation Problem Denfeld dialectical discussion dumb blond EEOC EEOC guidelines employers essay experience fact female feminism feminists fight against sexual formal frameworks gender politics Hajdin harassment of women harm heterosexual identify injury insensitivity involved issue Katie Roiphe kind legal prohibition LeMoncheck male matter men's sexual ment Meritor Savings Bank morally wrong oppression organizational overlap Paglia Paula perspective problem promiscuity quid pro quo rape rassment Reasonable Woman regarded response Roiphe second reason sex discrimination sexism sexual advances sexual assault sexual conduct sexual harassment law sexual harassment policies sexual integrity sexual nature sexual politics sexual relationships simply tion treated ual harassment views violation of sexual workplace world"-travel wrongdoing wrongness of sexual