Silence and Freedom
"You have the right to remain silent." These words, drawn from the Supreme Court's famous decision in Miranda v. Arizona, have had a tremendous impact on the public imagination. But what a strange right this is. Of all the activities that are especially worthy of protection, that define us as human beings, foster human potential, and symbolize human ambition, why privilege silence?
This thoughtful and iconoclastic book argues that silence can be an expression of freedom. A defiant silence demonstrates determination, courage, and will. Martyrs from a variety of faith traditions have given up their lives rather than renounce their god. During the Vietnam era, thousands of anonymous draft resisters refused to take the military oath that was a prelude to participating in what they believed was an immoral war. These silences speak to us. They are a manifestation of connection, commitment, and meaning.
This link between silence and freedom is apparent in a variety of different contexts, which Seidman examines individually, including silence and apology, silence and self-incrimination, silence and interrogation, silence and torture, and silence and death. In discussing the problem of apology, for example, the author argues that although apology plays a crucial role in maintaining the illusion of human connection, the right to not apologize is equally crucial. Similarly, prohibition against torture—so prominent in national debate since the events of Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib—is best understood as a right to silence, essential in preserving the distinction between mind and body on which human freedom depends.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
The Strangest Right
Some Useful Dichotomies
Apology and Silence
7 other sections not shown
Akhil Reed Amar Alan Dershowitz argue assisted suicide Barnette believe chapter choice choose claim coerced coercion commitment compelled speech compulsion confession constitutional context conviction course criminal death decision defendant defendant's dissent doctrine euthanasia example fact Fifth Amendment privilege force forgiveness Fourth Amendment freedom Gobitis guilty human incrimination individual infliction insist Jacobo Timerman jury Justice least liberal position ment Miranda Miranda warnings moral nonetheless obligation outcome particularist Perhaps persistent vegetative person pervasive determinism pervasive determinists physical plea bargaining Pledge police political private sphere problem prosecution protection punishment question radical libertarian rationality reason remain silent response right to silence right to withhold Ronald Dworkin self-incrimination sense severe pain simply skepticism Spano Steven Goldberg suicide Suppose supra Supreme Court sure suspect testify testimony theory thought tion torture treat turn universalist values victim violated withhold apology witness