Starr: A Reassessment

Front Cover
Yale University Press, 2002 - Law - 251 pages
0 Reviews
How is Kenneth Starr's extraordinary term as independent counsel to be understood? Was he a partisan warrior out to get the Clintons, or a savior of the Republic? An unstoppable menace, an unethical lawyer, or a sex-obsessed Puritan striving to enforce a right-wing social morality? This book is the first serious, impartial effort to evaluate and critique Starr's tenure as independent counsel. Relying on lengthy, revealing interviews with Starr and many other players in Clintonera Washington, Washington Post journalist Benjamin Wittes arrives at a new understanding of Starr and the part he played in one of American history's most enthralling public sagas.

Wittes offers a subtle and deeply considered portrait of a decent man who fundamentally misconstrued his function under the independent counsel law. Starr took his task to be ferreting out and reporting the truth about official misconduct, a well-intentioned but nevertheless misguided distortion of the law, Wittes argues. At key moments throughout Starr's probe -- from the decision to reinvestigate the death of Vincent Foster, Jr., to the repeated prosecutions of Susan McDougal and Webster Hubbell to the failure to secure Monica Lewinsky's testimony quickly -- the prosecutor avoided the most sensible prosecutorial course, fearing that it would compromise the larger search for truth. This approach not only delayed investigations enormously, but it gave Starr the appearance of partisan zealotry and an almost maniacal determination to prosecute the president. With insight and originality, Wittes provides in this account of Starr's term a fascinating reinterpretation of the man, his performance, and the controversial events thatsurrounded the impeachment of President Clinton.

 

What people are saying - Write a review

STARR: A Reassessment

User Review  - Jane Doe - Kirkus

Washington Post editorialist Wittes takes a sympathetic second look at Kenneth Starr.There's little middle ground in opinions on the controversial special prosecutor. Depending on whom you ask, Starr ... Read full review

Starr: a reassessment

User Review  - Not Available - Book Verdict

An editorial writer for the Washington Post who has written extensively on the federal court system, law, and criminal justice, Wittes reevaluates Kenneth Starr's role in the independent counsel ... Read full review

Contents

Images of Starr I
29
The Truth Commission and Whitewater
71
The Truth Commission and Monica
143
Separating Truth From Justice
183
Notes
203
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

References to this book

About the author (2002)

Benjamin Wittes is an editorial writer for the Washington Post who writes on matters involving the federal courts, major federal investigations, law, and criminal justice.

Bibliographic information