Hva folk mener - Skriv en omtale
Vi har ikke funnet noen omtaler på noen av de vanlige stedene.
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
activities acts Administration alleged American appear asked Attorney authority believe break-in campaign candidates cause Chairman charges Committee concerned conduct confidentiality Congress connection considered Constitution contribution Convention conversations corporate Counsel Count course criminal Dean decision defendant Democratic Department directed discussed District Court District of Columbia documents Ehrlichman election evidence executive fact filed funds further going Government Grand Jury guilty Haldeman Hunt indictment individual investigation involved issue John Judge July June Justice Magruder March material matter mean meeting Mitchell Nixon notes November October operation political possible present President Presidential privilege question raised received record referred regard request responsibility Senate September Special Prosecutor staff statement subpoena talk tapes testify testimony thing tion Title 18 told unintelligible United United States Code violation Washington Watergate White House witness
Side 138 - Every person who, having taken an oath before a competent tribunal, officer, or person, in any case in which a law of the United States authorizes an oath to be administered...
Side 165 - We conclude that when the ground for asserting privilege as to subpoenaed materials sought for use in a criminal trial is based only on the generalized interest in confidentiality, it cannot prevail over the fundamental demands of due process of law in the fair administration of criminal justice.
Side 191 - An act concerning aliens," is contrary to the Constitution, one amendment to which has provided that "no person shall be deprived of liberty without due process of law...
Side 184 - Deciding whether a matter has in any measure been committed by the Constitution to another branch of government, or whether the action of that branch exceeds whatever authority has been committed, is itself a delicate exercise in constitutional interpretation, and is a responsibility of this Court as ultimate interpreter of the Constitution.
Side 185 - Human experience teaches that those who expect public dissemination of their remarks may well temper candor with a concern for appearances and for their own interests to the detriment of the decisionmaking process.
Side 189 - The ends of criminal justice would be defeated if judgments were to be founded on a partial or speculative presentation of the facts. The very integrity of the judicial system and public confidence in the system depend on full disclosure of all the facts, within the framework of the rules of evidence. To ensure that justice is done, it is imperative to the function of courts that compulsory process be available for the production of evidence needed either by the prosecution or by the defense....
Side 187 - The impediment that an absolute, unqualified privilege would place in the way of the primary constitutional duty of the judicial branch to do justice in criminal prosecutions would plainly conflict with the function of the courts under Art. III.
Side 186 - Absent a claim of need to protect military, diplomatic or sensitive national security secrets, we find it difficult to accept the argument that even the very important interest in...
Side 176 - So long as this regulation remains in force the Executive Branch is bound by it, and indeed the United States as the sovereign composed of the three branches is bound to respect and enforce it.