Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical GuideSuch diverse thinkers as Lao-Tze, Confucius, and U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld have all pointed out that we need to be able to tell the difference between real and assumed knowledge. The systematic review is a scientific tool that can help with this difficult task. It can help, for example, with appraising, summarising, and communicating the results and implications of otherwise unmanageable quantities of data. This book, written by two highly-respected social scientists, provides an overview of systematic literature review methods:
|
Contents
Chapter 2 Starting the review Refining the question | 27 |
Chapter 3 What sorts of studies do I include in the review?
Deciding on the reviews inclusionexclusion criteria | 57 |
Chapter 4 How to find the studies The literature search | 79 |
Chapter 5 How to appraise the studies An introduction to
assessing study quality | 125 |
Chapter 6 Synthesizing the evidence | 164 |
Chapter 7 Exploring heterogeneity and publication bias | 215 |
Chapter 8 Disseminating the review | 247 |
Chapter 9 Systematic reviews Urban myths and fairy tales | 265 |
Appendix 1 The review process and some questions to ask
before starting a review | 284 |
Appendix 2 MOOSE Guidelines | 288 |
Appendix 3 Example of a flow diagram from a systematic review | 291 |
Appendix 4 Example data extraction form | 293 |
Appendix 5 Variations in the quality of systematic reviews | 296 |
Bibliography | 298 |
| 324 | |
Glossary | 277 |
Other editions - View all
Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide Mark Petticrew,Helen Roberts No preview available - 2006 |
Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide Mark Petticrew,Helen Roberts No preview available - 2006 |
Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide Mark Petticrew,Helen Roberts No preview available - 2005 |
Common terms and phrases
abstracts accessed February 24 analysis answer approach biases British Medical Journal British MedicalJournal Campbell Collaboration carried Centre chapter clinical trials Cochrane Collaboration Cochrane Library Cochrane Review Cont’d context critical appraisal Davey Smith described difficult dissemination effect size effect sizes Egger electronic databases ESRC evaluation evidence-based example explore findings Forest plot Health Technology Assessment heterogeneity identified identify impact implementation inclusion criteria internal validity involves issues literature reviews Medline meta-analysis methodological methods observational studies outcomes papers Petticrew policymakers population practice prevention primary studies problem programs Psychological public health publication bias published qualitative research qualitative studies quantitative randomized controlled trials range RCTs reports research synthesis review question risk Scared Straight scientific search strategy smoking social interventions social science specific statistical study designs study quality subgroup summary systematic reviews tion types University of York users validity variables


