Taking journalism seriously: "objectivity" as a partisan cause
Taking Journalism Seriously provides a groundbreaking analysis of the adequacy of the standard of objectivity in journalism, using the journalistic principles of the Founding Fathers of America as the point of comparison.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
How CBS Edits Interviews and Speeches
How CBS Defends its Editing Practices
CBS Makes its Case Against Propaganda
11 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Administration alleged Amendment American policy authority believed bill of rights broadcast cause chapter citizens claim commitment communism communist Congress Constitution course criticism decision Defense Department democracy democratic denied documentary documents editing editorial Emphasis added facts factual federal Federalist films freedom governmental Hamilton Henkin human Ibid implied interest interview issue James Madison James Reston Jefferson journalism journalistic judge judgment libel liberalism liberty maintained major mass media means ment merely military modern Mudd neutral newsmen newspaper objective journalism objectivity partisan partisanship passion Pentagon papers Pentagon propaganda perspective point of view political principles President problem public opinion public's right publish purpose question reason reporter's reporting republic republican Reston right to know Roger Mudd role secrecy South Vietnam Souvanna Phouma speech standard Stanton statement Sub-Committee television Thomas Jefferson tion truth U.S. Constitution U.S. Supreme Court Walter Lippmann York