Telecompetition: The Free Market Road to the Information Highway
We are on the verge of gaining access to a cornucopia of information and entertainment, but government regulation threatens to bottle up the new technology. Cable and telephone companies are both protected from competition and forbidden to enter new markets. The Clinton administration considers spending billions of taxpayers' dollars to build an "information superhighway" that private companies are champing at the bit to build at no cost to the government.
Today's Information Revolution is driven by three smaller revolutions in microelectronic, digital, and optical technology. The microelectronic revolution, based on the transistor and then the microprocessor, has given us word processors, programmable VCRs, "featureful" home telephones, and personal computers, all of which have moved computing power away from a technical elite and closer to the average citizen. The digital revolution allows information in any form - even graphics and sound - to be processed by machines. And the fiber-optic revolution means that much more information can be transmitted simultaneously.
Together, those technological changes are erasing the boundaries that have separated voice, video, text, and data communications and are making regulatory policy as obsolete as dial telephones and vacuum tubes. Regulations have been based on the outmoded notions of natural monopoly, spectrum scarcity, and captive audiences - none of which seem very compelling in the modern era of Telecompetition.
Communications analyst Lawrence Gasman argues that the best way to gain the benefits of new information technology is not a government-backed "communications superhighway" but a policy of free markets, deregulation, property rights, and upholding the First Amendment. The most important role for government is to protect property rights, then stand back and watch as new technologies break through the boundaries of old regulations.
Telecompetition is the comprehensive case for deregulating telecommunications. It discusses such key issues as deregulating the Baby Bells, spectrum auctions, First Amendment rights for broadcasters, and the national data highway. Telecompetition shows that bureaucrats have neither the knowledge nor the incentive to intelligently guide the Information Revolution.
With the regulatory stranglehold on telecommunications actually tightening in some ways - such as the 1992 Cable Act - even as the free market struggles to bring modern technology to all our homes and offices, Telecompetition is a valuable argument for deregulation, First Amendment rights, and free markets.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Telecommunications Regulation and the Three
The Myth of the Communications Monopoly
5 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
airwaves allow alternative-access carriers Amendment antitrust areas argue argument AT&T bandwidth Bell companies Bell Labs Bell system broadband broadcasting cable companies cable television CCITT cellular central channels common carriers communica communications infrastructure communications markets communications services competition consumers convergence coordination cost decisions deregulation dominant electronic communications equipment European example FCC's fiber optics fiber-optic frequencies groups hackers high-definition television important information services information technology infrastructuralists Inmarsat Intelsat Intelsat and Inmarsat interest interference ISDN Legion of Doom licenses long-distance ment microelectronics Minitel monopoly newspaper NREN offer operators organizations owners personal computers policymakers political programming property rights protection radio communications regulation regulatory role satellite spectrum allocation spectrum management spectrum rights standards switching technological convergence tele telecommunica telecommunications policy telephone companies telephone network telephone service terminals tions transmission transmit U.S. government users videoconferencing videotex