Televised College Football: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations of the Committee on Energy and Commerce, House of Representatives, Ninety-eighth Congress, Second Session, July 31, 1984 |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
ABC and CBS appear areas attendance basketball Big Ten Conference broadcast cable carrier CFA members CFA television plan Chairman championship coaches college basketball College Football Association college football games college football television Collegiate Athletic Association Commercial competition contract Court of Appeals Court's decision Crouthamel Division I-A Division II dollars enforcement ESPN exposure football playing football powers FOOTBALL TELEVISION PLAN going HALLOCK I-AA independent stations injunction intercollegiate athletics Joe Paterno Judge Burciaga Kansas major marketplace MARKEY member institutions membership million National Collegiate Athletic National Series NBC Sports NCAA Football Television NCAA plan NCAA's negotiated Neinas networks number of games Oklahoma Pac Ten participating Paterno percent Pilson question recruiting restrictions rights fees rules schedule schools Sherman Act SLATTERY Southwestern Athletic Conference student athletes subcommittee Supreme Court decision teams telecast television package television rights Thank tion TONER University of Georgia viewers violation WORMINGTON WUSSLER
Popular passages
Page 63 - provides: Every order granting an injunction . . . shall be specific in terms; shall describe in reasonable detail, and not by reference to the complaint or other document, the act or acts sought to be restrained
Page 64 - officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and upon those persons in active concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of this order by personal service or otherwise.
Page 31 - The purpose of antitrust analysis, the Court emphasized, is to form a judgment about the competitive significance of the restraint; it is not to decide whether a policy favoring competition is in the public interest, or in the interest of the members of an industry.
Page 60 - by sale or other transfer of ownership, or by rental, lease or lending; to perform
Page 125 - by curtailing output and blunting the ability of member institutions to respond to consumer preference, the NCAA has restricted rather than enhanced the place of intercollegiate athletics in the Nation's life.
Page 31 - Ordinarily, the inquiry mandated by the Rule of Reason is whether the challenged agreement is one that promotes competition or one that suppresses competition. The
Page 2 - and blunting the ability of member institutions to respond to consumer preference, the NCAA has restricted, rather than enhanced, the place of intercollegiate athletics in the Nation's life.
Page 62 - in the individual schools. While we hold that the NCAA cannot lawfully maintain exclusive control of the rights, how far such rights may be commonly regulated involves speculation that should not be made on the record of the instant case. The
Page 144 - thank you for your participation and with that, this hearing is adjourned. Thank you. [Whereupon, at 4 pm, the subcommittee was adjourned.]
Page 32 - nor any other decision of this Court suggests that associations of nonprofit educational institutions must defend their self-regulatory restraints solely in terms of their competitive impact, without regard for the legitimate noneconomic values they promote. When these values are factored into the balance, the NCAA'S television plan seems eminently reasonable. Most fundamentally the