Teoría de la interpretación: discurso y excedente de sentido

Front Cover
Siglo XXI, 1995 - Literary Criticism - 112 pages
2 Reviews
El gran pensador francés, profesor emérito en la Universidad de Chicago, despliega en este libro una nueva serie de sus brillantes reflexiones. Después de estudiar el lenguaje como discurso (lengua y habla, acontecimiento y sentido, intención y expresión), Ricoeur aborda la diferencia entre habla y escritura, símbolo y metáfora, explicación y comprensión.
 

What people are saying - Write a review

User Review - Flag as inappropriate

pág 91

User Review - Flag as inappropriate

interpretacion

Selected pages

Contents

Section 5
38
Section 6
58
Section 7
83
Copyright

Common terms and phrases

References to this book

All Book Search results »

About the author (1995)

Professor of philosophy at the University of Paris and the University of Chicago, Paul Ricoeur has been described as "possibly the only younger philosopher in Europe whose reputation is of the magnitude of that of the old men of Existentialism---Marcel, Jaspers, Heidegger and Sartre . . . ." His work has been characterized as "the most massive accomplishment of any philosopher of Christian faith since the appearance of Gabriel Marcel." A practitioner of the phenomenology of Edmund Husserl mediated by a return to Immanuel Kant---in that things in themselves, though unknowable, are not excluded by bracketing existence but are acknowledged as the necessary conditions for the possibility of human experience---Ricoeur has examined those parts of experience---faulty, fallible, and susceptible to error and evil---that other phenomenologists, interested primarily in the cognitional, have neglected. In this respect he follows in the footsteps of Heidegger and Sartre, but he goes beyond them in his discovery of principles transcending human subjectivity that are amenable to spiritual interpretation. Here Ricoeur steps within the contemporary hermeneutic circle of Heidegger and Hans-Georg Gadamer, on whom he has written. Ricoeur's hermeneutical method, however, has much in common with the methods of biblical exegesis, and in this respect his works should be especially appealing to seminarians and the clergy.

Bibliographic information