What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
1 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
adequate measure Amo.Hv AQQ.Qc aQQ.Qc AsQ.Hc Average number benefit estimates central business district Chi—square test city of Worcester coefficients consumer surplus distance to park Dummy variables economic value effect Elm Park external benefits feet frcm Green Hill groups Hadwen Hagerty hedonic pricing house characteristics house price household I‘able length of stay location rent multicollinearity Multiple Listing Service nearest park neighborhood characteristics noise number of bedrooms number of visits on-site benefits open space park accessibility park attributes park most frequently percent previous month Privacy Rating problem property value approach property value method provide an adequate QQQ Q QQQ.Q QQQ.s QQs.Q QsQ.Q recreation facilities regression rent gradient renters Resource Economics respondents sample significant sone sQQ.Q statistically survey Table Tbtal technique telephone travel cost method travel cost model travel mode urban forests urban parks users visit a park Weekday Weekend willingness to pay willingness—to—pay Worcester