The Best Argument against God

Front Cover
Springer, Jul 23, 2013 - Philosophy - 93 pages
0 Reviews
.... compares two theories—Naturalism and Theism—on a wide range of relevant data. It concludes that Naturalism should be preferred to Theism on that data. The central idea behind the argument is that, while Naturalism is simpler than Theism, there is no relevant data that Naturalism fails to explain at least as well as Theism does.
 

What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.

Contents

Preface
SomeBigIdeas
Standard Theism and Naturalism
Conclusion
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

About the author (2013)

Graham Oppy is Professor of Philosophy at Monash University. He is the author of: Ontological Arguments and Belief in God (1996); Philosophical Perspectives on Infinity (2006); Arguing about Gods (2006); Reading Philosophy of Religion (2010, with Michael Scott); and co-editor of The History of Western Philosophy of Religion (2009, with Nick Trakakis).

Bibliographic information