The Bowl Championship Series: Is it Fair and in Compliance with Antitrust Law? : Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition Policy, and Consumer Rights of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, One Hundred Eleventh Congress, First Session, July 7, 2009
United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition Policy, and Consumer Rights
U.S. Government Printing Office, 2010 - Antitrust law - 243 pages
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
addition agreement anticompetitive antitrust appear AQ Conferences arrangement athletic attractive BCS bowl games BCS Control Group BCS Standings BCS system beneﬁts Big East Bowl Coalition champion claim coaches college football Commissioner Committee compete competition Conference teams consumers contract Court created current system Dame determine distribution Division economic effect example exist fact fair fans ﬁeld Fiesta ﬁnal ﬁrst ﬁve four going guaranteed harm hearing impact increased independent institutions issues January less limited major matter million monopoly Mountain West national champion national championship game NCAA Non-AQ Conference opportunity Orange output participate performance play playoff playoff system polls post-season President programs qualify ranked received record regular season respect result revenue Rose Bowl rule schools selection Senator HATCH Sherman Act structure success Sugar Bowl television tournament universities violation winning