The Chattahoochee chiefdoms
University of Alabama Press, Apr 28, 2006 - History - 287 pages
An overview and model of complex society in the prehistoric Southeast. Along the banks of the lower Chattahoochee River, the remains of ancient settlements are abundant, including archaeological sites produced by Native Americans between 900 and 350 years ago, and marked by the presence of large earthen mounds. Like similar monuments elsewhere in the Southeastern United States, the lower Chatta-hoochee River mounds have long attracted the attention of travelers, antiquarians, and archaeologists. As objects from the mounds were unearthed, occasionally illustrated and discussed in print, attention became focused on the aesthetic qualities of the artifacts, the origins of the remains, and the possible relationship to the Creek Indians. Beginning in the 20th century, new concerns emerged as the developing science of archaeology was introduced to the region. As many of the sites became threatened or destroyed by reservoir construction, trained archaeologists initiated extensive excavations of the mounds. Although classification of artifacts and sites into a chronological progression of cultures was the main objective of this effort, a second concern, sometimes more latent than manifest, was the reconstruction of a past way of life. Archaeologists hoped to achieve a better understanding of the sociopolitical organization of the peoples who built the mounds and of how those organizations changed through time. Contemporary archaeologists, while in agreement on many aspects of the ancient cultures, debate the causes, forms, and degrees of sociopolitical complexity in the ancient Southeast. Do the mounds mark the capitals of political territories? If so, what was the scale and scope of these ancient “provinces”? What manner of society constructed the mound settlements? What was the sociopolitical organization of these long-dead populations? How can archaeologists answer such queries with the mute and sometimes ordinary materials with which they work: pottery, stone tools, organic residues, and the strata of remnant settlements, buildings, and mounds?
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Mississippian Political and Social Integration
Archaeology of the Mound Centers
8 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
abandoned Apalachicola River archaeological archaeologists artifacts Bull Creek celt Cemochechobee ceramic assemblages ceramic phases ceramic style zones Chattahoochee River region chronology clay cluster complex chiefdom component Cool Branch Incised cultural decorated elite Fall Line Figure Gary's Fish Pond Huscher identified inter-regional interaction Kyle Lake Jackson Lamar Complicated Stamped Lamar Plain Lampley levels lower Chattahoochee River midden Middle Mississippi Mississippian mound Mississippian political mound building mound centers mound construction Mound H mound sites mound stage mound-political units Moundville Moundville Incised multiple-mound centers Omussee Creek period phase A.D. platform mounds political and social political integration polity boundaries polity fission-fusion polity forms population movement potsherds pottery pottery samples pottery type provenience units radiocarbon dates Red Filmed Rood I phase Rood's Landing Scarry Schnell SECC seriation shell-tempered sherds simple-complex chiefdom model Singer phase Singer-Moye smoking pipe social integration Stewart phase Structure style-zone frontiers summit tion utilitarian ceramic style vessel Wakulla Walton Incised