The Common Law Tradition: A Collective Portrait of Five Legal Scholars

Front Cover
George W. Liebmann
Transaction Publishers, Apr 30, 2006 - Law - 367 pages
0 Reviews

This book commemorates a place and a time in American law teaching, but more importantly, an outlook: the common law tradition. That outlook was empirical and tolerant. These values were carried into expression by a group of people who were not part of a cult or faction nor ruled by the herd instinct. Now in paperback, The Common Law Tradition is a collective portrait of five scholars who epitomize the tradition.

The focus is Chicago in the 1960s. The five figures considered--Edward H. Levi, Harry Kalven, Jr., Karl Llewellyn, Philip Kurland, and Kenneth Culp Davis--did much to broaden the perspectives of the legal academy. Levi made use of sociology, economics, and comparative law. Kalven collaborated with sociologists on the Jury Project and with economists on tax law and auto compensation plans. Llewellyn's commitment to empirical research underpinned his work on the Uniform Commercial Code. Kurland's approach to constitutional law was highlighted by his insistence on the relevance of legal history. Davis was an energetic comparativist in his work on administrative law. What distinguished these Chicagoans is that their work was practical and rooted in the law, and hence yielded concrete applications. The group's diversity, the tolerant atmosphere in which they taught and wrote, and the attachment of its individual members to empirical approaches differentiate them from today's legal scholars and make their ideas of continuing importance.

 

What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.

Contents

Carrington
1
Edward H Levi 1
11
Harry Kalven Jr
79
Karl Llewellyn
149
Philip Kurland
193
Kenneth Culp Davis
251
Conclusion
305
Bibliography
327
Table of Cases
347
Index
353
About the Author
367
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page xiv - While good men sit at home, not knowing that there is anything to be done, nor caring to know; cultivating a feeling that politics are tiresome and dirty, and politicians vulgar bullies and bravoes; half persuaded that a republic is the contemptible rule of a mob, and secretly longing for a splendid and vigorous despotism— then remember it is not a government mastered by...

Bibliographic information