The Concept of Injustice

Front Cover
Routledge, Nov 12, 2012 - Law - 218 pages

The Concept of Injustice challenges traditional Western justice theory. Thinkers from Plato and Aristotle through to Kant, Hegel, Marx and Rawls have subordinated the idea of injustice to the idea of justice. Misled by the word’s etymology, political theorists have assumed injustice to be the sheer, logical opposite of justice. Heinze summons ancient and early modern texts, philosophical and literary, with special attention to Shakespeare, to argue that injustice is not primarily the negation, failure or absence of justice. It is the constant product of regimes and norms of justice. Justice is not always the cure for injustice, and is often its cause.

 

What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.

Contents

Sources
Nietzsches echo
Classical understandings
Injustice as the negation ofjustice
Injustice as disunity
Injustice as mismeasurement
Injustice as unity
Injustice as measurement
8
Index
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

About the author (2012)

Eric Heinze is Professor of Law and Humanities at Queen Mary, University of London. His most recent publications on legal theory have appeared in Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Ratio Juris, International Journal of Law in Context, Legal Studies, Journal of Social & Legal Studies, Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, Law & Critique, Law & Literature, and Law & Humanities.

Bibliographic information