The Fundamentalist Mind: How Polarized Thinking Imperils Us All
We are all fundamentalists whether we acknowledge it or not. We were born into a world of myth and metaphor and have come to internalize the stories we were told as children as the literal interpretations of much greater and deeply symbolic lessons. When we fall into such patterns, according to author and psychotherapist Stephen Larsen, we lose all flexibility and freedom of thought. We become split by dualistic thinking—bad versus good; black versus white—and are weighted down by definitive, concretistic principles and behaviors that alienate us from one another. Dr. Larsen explains that we can avoid such pitfalls by identifying our “inner fundamentalist” and becoming more open-minded individuals.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
American amygdala angel Antichrist authoritarian authority become belief systems believe Bible biofeedback Branch Davidians called Campbell’s century chapter Christ Christian church cingulate cognitive cortex creative culture Davidians dissociation divine dream dualism emotional Eric Hoffer evangelicals evil experience fatwa figure fragments Freud funda fundamentalism fundamentalist fundamentalist thinking God’s gods happened hero holy human brain idea inner Irenaeus Islam Jerry Falwell Jesus Jews Joseph Campbell Jung kind Koresh Larsen literally living mental metaphor millennialism millennialist mind mirror neurons modern Muhammad Muslims myth mythic mythogem mythology natural religion nervous system neurofeedback neurological one’s people’s person Power of Myth problems prophecy prophet psyche psychological Qur’an Rapture religious revealed right hemisphere ritual sacred Satan Satanic Verses scientific scientism secular seems shamanic Shi’a social soul spiritual Stephen Larsen story Swedenborg symbolic therapist things thought tion traditions unconscious universe writing York