The Mild Voice of Reason: Deliberative Democracy and American National Government
In recent years, many Americans and more than a few political scientists have come to believe that democratic deliberation in Congress—whereby judgments are made on the merits of policies reflecting the interests and desires of American citizens—is more myth than reality. Rather, pressure from special interest groups, legislative bargaining, and the desire of incumbents to be reelected are thought to originate in American legislative politics. While not denying such influences, Joseph M. Bessette argues that the institutional framework created by the founding fathers continues to foster a government that is both democratic and deliberative, at least to some important degree.
Drawing on original research, case studies of policymaking in Congress, and portraits of American lawmakers, Bessette demonstrates not only the limitations of nondeliberative explanations for how laws are made but also the continued vitality of genuine reasoning on the merits of public policy. Bessette discusses the contributions of the executive branch to policy deliberation, and looks at the controversial issue of the proper relationship of public opinion to policymaking.
Informed by Bessette's nine years of public service in city and federal government, The Mild Voice of Reason offers important insights into the real workings of American democracy, articulates a set of standards by which to assess the workings of our governing institutions, and clarifies the forces that promote or inhibit the collective reasoning about common goals so necessary to the success of American democracy.
"No doubt the best-publicized recent book-length work on Congress is columnist George Will's diatribe in praise of term limits in which the core of his complaint is that Congress does not deliberate in its decision-making. Readers who are inclined to share that fantasy would do well to consult the work of Joseph M. Bessette. He turns up massive amounts of material attesting to the centrality of deliberation in congressional life."—Nelson W. Polsby, Presidential Studies Quarterly
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
The Creation of Deliberative Democracy in the United States
Deliberation Democracy and Policymaking
Bargaining and Collective Decisions The Limits
Interest Ambition and the Character of Lawmakers
Deliberation and the Lawmaking Process
The Presidents Contribution to Congressional Deliberations
Public Opinion and Democratic Statesmanship
action activities addressed administration Agriculture American appeals argued arguments attention authority bargaining bill body branch chapter committee common Congress congressional consideration Constitution debate decisions deliberation deliberative democracy Democrats desire detailed direct discussion effective efforts election electoral example executive federal Federalist floor floor debate food stamp force formal framers give goals groups hearings House and Senate Ibid important influence institutions interests issues judgment kind lawmaking leaders legislative legislature less logroll majority matters Means meetings ment merits Mills mind noted opposed original party passed persuasion political popular position present president Press principle problem promote proposal public opinion public policy reason record reelection reform representatives Republicans responsible result rhetoric rule serve simply sound staff success term tion University votes wanted Washington York
Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy
Limited preview - 2000
All Book Search results »