The Myths of Standardized Tests: Why They Don't Tell You What You Think They Do
Phillip Harris, Ed.D., executive director, Association for Educational Communications & Technology, Bruce M. Smith, Joan Harris
Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Jan 16, 2011 - Education - 206 pages
Pundits, politicians, and business leaders continually make claims for what standardized tests can do, and those claims go largely unchallenged because they are in line with popular assumptions about what these tests can do, what the scores mean, and the psychology of human motivation. But what most of what these opinion leaders say-and the public believes-about standardized testing just isn't so. However, few members of the general public, not even concerned parents, have the time or the background to keep up with the latest findings of testing experts, psychometricians, and researchers. That's where The Myths of Standardized Tests comes in. In simple, accessible language, Harris, Smith, and Harris spell out the assumptions underlying standardized tests and point out what's true about them and what's just plain mythical. But they not only debunk common assumptions; they propose better ways to judge the success of our schools. They also offer readers suggestions for ways they can help reduce the burden of tests on their children. Appendixes offer readers contact information and suggestions for actions they can take to become part of the solution to the problem of overusing and misusing standardized tests.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
academic accountability system accountability tests Alfie Kohn American answer areas assessment assumptions average Baird behavior Bracey Campbell’s Law chapter Child Left cited classroom curriculum cut scores David Berliner Deborah Meier didn’t district doesn’t domain evaluation exam FairTest focus goals grade levels grade retention Grading Education graduate high school high-stakes testing impact important improve included Indiana inferences inﬂuence judging judgment kids kind Koretz learning look math means measure NAEP National NCLB numbers Obama outcomes parents percent performance Phi Delta Kappan policy makers predict problem programs psychometrician psychometrics public schools Punished by Rewards punishments questions reﬂect response rewards Richard Rothstein sample sanctions school accountability simple skills social standardized test scores standardized tests state’s Stephen Jay Gould student achievement success teach teachers there’s things tion today’s validity we’re we’ve What’s