The Politics of Postsecular Religion: Mourning Secular Futures
Ananda Abeysekara contends that democracy, along with its cherished secular norms, is founded on the idea of a promise deferred to the future. Rooted in democracy's messianic promise is the belief that religious—political identity-such as Buddhist, Hindu, Sinhalese, Christian, Muslim, or Tamil—can be critiqued, neutralized, improved, and changed, even while remaining inseparable from the genocide of the past. This facile belief, he argues, is precisely what distracts us from challenging the violence inherent in postcolonial political sovereignty. At the same time, we cannot simply dismiss the democratic concept, since it permeates so deeply through our modernist, capitalist, and humanist selves.
In The Politics of Postsecular Religion, Abeysekara invites us to reconsider our ethical-political legacies, to look at them not as problems, but as aporias, in the Derridean sense-that is, as contradictions or impasses incapable of resolution. Disciplinary theorizing in religion and politics, he argues, is unable to identify the aporias of our postcolonial modernity. The aporetic legacies, which are like specters that cannot be wished away, demand a new kind of thinking. It is this thinking that Abeysekara calls mourning and un-inheriting. Un-inheriting is a way of meditating on history that both avoids the simple binary of remembering and forgetting and provides an original perspective on heritage, memory, and time.
Abeysekara situates aporias in the settings and cultures of the United States, France, England, Sri Lanka, India, and Tibet. In presenting concrete examples of religion in public life, he questions the task of refashioning the aporetic premises of liberalism and secularism. Through close readings of Nietzsche, Heidegger, Arendt, Derrida, Butler, and Agamben, as well as Foucault, Asad, Chakrabarty, Balibar, and Zizek, he offers readers a way to think about the futures of postsecular politics that is both dynamic and creative.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
2 Aporias of Secularism
A Problem of Inheritance
A Politics Between a NoLonger and a NotYet?
5 Impassable Limits of Fugitive Politics
Other editions - View all
active forgetting already Anil’s Ghost aporia Arendt argues argument Asad belong Buddhist Carl Schmitt Chakrabarty chapter Christianity claims concept constitute critical critique culture Da-sein death debate deconstruction deferred demand democracy democratic Derrida says Dipesh Chakrabarty distinction enemy ethical Foucault freedom Friedrich Nietzsche friendship future genealogy ghostly haunted Heidegger Heidegger’s Hence heritage historicization human I-witness idea identity im-possibility inherit irreducible Ismail Jacques Derrida justice kind Kymlicka legacy liberal live logic LTTE Michel Foucault modernity monks mourning nation-state never Nietzsche Nietzsche’s non-presence not-yet notion one’s oneself past perhaps phallogocentric pluralism political sovereignty possible postcolonial present Princeton problem of Ayubowan problematization promise Qadri Ismail question relation religion religious remains responsibility Revolution riots Rorty Schmitt secularism secularists sense simply Sinhala Sinhalese speak specter Sri Lanka Talal Asad Tamil Tibet Tibetan tion tolerance tradition trans un-inheriting University Press violence words Žižek