The Punjab Record, 21±Ç |
´Ù¸¥ »ç¶÷µéÀÇ ÀÇ°ß - ¼Æò ¾²±â
¼ÆòÀ» ãÀ» ¼ö ¾ø½À´Ï´Ù.
±âŸ ÃâÆÇº» - ¸ðµÎ º¸±â
ÀÚÁÖ ³ª¿À´Â ´Ü¾î ¹× ±¸¹®
accused Act XIV adoption alleged Amritsar Appellate Court application appointed Arains authority British India charge Chief Court delivered Civil Procedure Code claim clause conviction costs Criminal Procedure Code custom dated death deceased decided decision decree decree-holder defendant Deputy Commissioner dismissed District Judge District Magistrate Divisional Court Divisional Judge enquiry entitled Esquire evidence execution facts Government granted ground held Indian Law Reports Indian Penal Code Jats judgment judgment-debtor Jullundur jurisdiction Lahore lambardar land lessee Limitation Act lower Courts Magistrate Mangal ment mortgage Mussammat notice offence officer owner parties passed person petroleum plaintiff pleader Plowden possession prescribed proceedings provisions Punjab Record question Rattan Chand reference regard Register Registrar remand respondent revenue rules rupees second appeal Section sentence Sessions Judge Settlement Singh Small Cause Court Smyth sued sufficiently appear suit tahsil Tahsildar tion tramway Tremlett Umballa Versus widow
Àαâ Àο뱸
57 ÆäÀÌÁö - Distance, knowingly and •wilfully proceed in any such Carriage beyond such Distance without previously paying the additional Fare for the additional Distance, and with Intent to avoid Payment thereof, or if any Person knowingly and wilfully...
103 ÆäÀÌÁö - The established Courts of Justice, when a question arises whether the prescribed limits have been exceeded, must of necessity determine that question ; and the only way in which they can properly do so, is by looking to the terms of the instrument, by which, affirmatively the legislative powers were created, and by which, negatively they are restricted. If what has been done is legislation, within the general scope of the affirmative words which give the power, and if it violates...
171 ÆäÀÌÁö - Ignorantia juris haud excusat; but in that maxim the word 'jus' is used in the sense of denoting general law, the ordinary law of the country. But when the word 'jus' is used in the sense of denoting a private right, that maxim has no application. Private right of ownership is a matter of fact ; it may be the result also of matter of law; but if parties contract under a mutual mistake and misapprehension as to their relative and respective rights, the result is, that that agreement is liable to be...
85 ÆäÀÌÁö - ... by entry in the margin, without any alteration of the original entry...