The Reception of Luke and Acts in the Period Before Irenaeus: Looking for Luke in the Second Century
"When and how may Christians first be shown to have used the Gospel of Luke and its companion volume, The Acts of the Apostles? Andrew Gregory offers the first book-length discussion of the reception of Luke and of Acts in the period before Irenaeus. The research project which was the basis of this monograph was originally conceived as a comparison of the pneumatology of Luke-Acts with the pneumatologies presented in Christian literature of the second century. Recent scholarship on Lukan pneumatology is agreed that Luke has a particular interest in the Spirit, but it is divided as to whether his pneumatology is part of a homogenous early Christian understanding or a distinctive presentation that is to be sharply differentiated from that of Matthew and Mark, of John, and of Paul. Noting a lacuna identified by Turner, the author set out to originally ask two questions. First, whether it might be possible to identify in second century pneumatologies any characteristics that New Testament scholars might label as distinctively Lukan. Second, whether such characteristics might be sufficient to indicate not only the influence of Lukan pneumatology but also a conscious appropriation of distinctively Lukan theology by other early Christians. Contents include: Introduction and methodology, Previous research, The evidence of the earliest manuscripts and notices, Do narrative outlines of episodes in the life of Jesus presuppose Luke?, Collections of the sayings of Jesus, Marcion, Justin Martyr, The reception of Luke in the Second Century, The reception of Acts in the Second Century, Early and Ambiguous Evidence, Justin Martyr, Narrative accounts explicitly concerning the Post-resurrection teaching of Jesus and the activity of Apostles and other prominent figures, The reception of Acts in the Period before Irenaeus, The reception of Luke and Acts in the Period before Irenaeus."
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Do Narrative Outlines of Episodes in the Life of Jesus
Collections of the Sayings of Jesus
The Reception of Luke in the Second Century
The Reception of Acts in the Second Century
Acts of John Acts of Paul Acts of Peter Apology Apostles appears argues argument ascension Barrett Basilides canonical Gospels Clement conclusion demonstrate dependence on Luke Dialogue Diatessaron Didache discussion double tradition drawn draws on Luke drew early Christian Ebionites Eusebius evidence extant fourfold Gospel gospel tradition harmony Harnack hypothesis ibid Ignatius independent infancy narrative instance Irenaeus John Justin knew Justin Martyr knowledge known Koester literary dependence Lukan redaction Luke and Acts Luke-Acts Luke's Luke’s Marcion Marcion's Gospel Marcionite Mark Massaux material Matson Matthean Matthew and Luke Muratorian Fragment Nag Hammadi Neirynck notes oral tradition Papias parallels period before Irenaeus Peter Polycarp Protevangelium Protevangelium of James question reading reception of Luke reference resurrection Schoedel second century seems similar Skarsaune suggests Synoptic Gospels synoptic tradition Tatian Tertullian Testament testimony textual Thomas Töv Tuckett Volume witness written Yāp