The Rhetoric of Risk: Technical Documentation in Hazardous Environments
The crash of an Amtrak train near Baltimore, the collapse of the Hyatt hotel in Kansas City, the incident at Three Mile Island, and other large-scale technological disasters have provided powerful examples of the ways that communication practices influence the events and decisions that precipitate a disaster. These examples have raised ethical questions about the responsibility of writers within agencies, epistemological questions about the nature of representation in science, and rhetorical questions about the nature of expertise and experience as grounds for judgments about risk.
In The Rhetoric of Risk: Technical Documentation in Hazardous Environments, author Beverly Sauer examines how the dynamic uncertainty of the material environment affects communication in large regulatory industries. Sauer's analysis focuses specifically on mine safety, which provides a rich technical and historical context where problems of rhetorical agency, narrative, and the negotiation of meaning have visible and tragic outcomes. But the questions Sauer asks have larger implication for risk and safety: How does writing function in large regulatory industries? What can we learn from experience? Why is this experience so difficult to capture in writing? What information is lost when agencies rely on written documentation alone? Given the uncertainties, how can we work to improve communication in hazardous and uncertain environments?
By exploring how individuals make sense of the material, technical, and institutional indeterminancies of their work in speech and gesture, The Rhetoric of Risk helps communicators rethink their frequently unquestioned assumptions about workplace discourse and the role of writers in hazardous worksites. It is intended for scholars and students in technical writing and communication, rhetoric, risk analysis and risk communication, as well as a wide range of engineering and technical fields concerned with risk, safety, and uncertainty.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
accident agencies agency’s analysis analytic viewpoint argue Atman audiences Bilsthorpe British Bureau of Mines chapter communication create Cycle of Technical danger decisions demonstrate Department of Labor describe disaster embodied experience Emery County engineering Explosion of Dec FATALGRAMs fire framework hand hazardous environments Health Administration Health and Safety inby individuals Influence diagram inspectors instructions interviews investigators knowledge Large Regulatory Industries Libby Libby’s longwall mining meaning methane mimetic viewpoint miners monitor MSHA MSHA’s Nagy narrative Nonmetal notion observe operator problems procedures produce Pyro regulations represent representations of risk rhetorical transformation Risk Assessment Risk Management rock roof bolts roof fall roof support Safety and Health scientific sensory Southmountain Coal speakers speech and gesture stakeholders standards strata suggests tacit knowledge Technical Documentation tion trainers U.S. Department uncertainty underground understanding ventilation warrant Wilberg Wise County workers workplace writing