The Violence of Peace: America's Wars in the Age of Obama
"The man who many considered the peace candidate in the last election was transformed into a war president," writes bestselling author and leading academic Stephen l. Carter in The Violence of Peace, his new book decoding what President Barack Obama's views on war mean for America and its role in military conflict, now and going forward. As America winds down a war in Iraq, ratchets up another in Afghanistan, and continues a global war on terrorism, Carter delves into the implications of the military philosophy Obama has adopted through his first two years in office. Responding to the invitation that Obama himself issued in his Nobel address, Carter uses the tools of the Western tradition of just and unjust war to evaluate Obama's actions and words about military conflict, offering insight into how the president will handle existing and future wars, and into how his judgment will shape America's fate. Carter also explores war as a way to defend others from tyrannical regimes, which Obama has endorsed but not yet tested, and reveals the surprising ways in which some of the tactics Obama has used or authorized are more extreme than those of his predecessor, George W. Bush. "Keeping the nation at peace," Carter writes, "often requires battle," and this book lays bare exactly how America's wars in Afghanistan and Iraq are shaping the way Obama views the country's role in conflict and peace, ultimately determining the fate of the nation.
What people are saying - Write a review
LibraryThing ReviewUser Review - nmele - LibraryThing
Carter examines the conduct of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, and of the War against Terror, in light of the Catholic just war tradition. His analysis and comments are objective, insightful and ... Read full review
Other editions - View all
Afghan Afghanistan al-Qaeda American argued argument arms army assassination attack Augustine Barack Obama battle battlefield believe bombing Bush Doctrine Christian civilians combatants conflict Consider critics decision defense democracy drone Elaine Scarry enemy Ethics evil example fight force Gandhi Geneva Conventions genocide human rights humanitarian Ibid intelligence international law Interrogation intervention invasion Iraq Iraq War Iraqi Jean Bethke Elshtain John Keegan jus ad bellum jus in bello justice justified kill leaders Lincoln lives matter McMahan Michael Walzer military missiles moral never Nobel Address nuclear Obama Administration peace perhaps political President Obama President’s prevent prisoners problem protect question reason regime risk rules Saddam sanctions seems self-defense side slaughter soldiers suggested Taliban target Terror terrorist theory things threat tion torture tradition troops true United Nations University Press Unjust Wars violence War on Terror weapons of mass words wrong York