What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
THE EFFECTS OF TIMESELECTIVE FADING
CHANNEL AND BASIC PULSE SHAPE
A COMPARISON OF THEORETICAL AND EXPERIMEN
analytic signal assumed basic pulse p(t basic pulse shape ceiver central peak change of variables characteristic function code length coded-pulse radar system coded-pulse signal considered Cornell University correlation function corresponding digits covariance function cumulative phase errors cumulative timing errors degradation Equation derived distributed timing errors Doppler shifts energy scattered ensemble of transmitters envelope detector Equation 1.7 evaluated expected ambiguity function expression for degradation expression for mean Figure five-digit Barker code Fourier transform frequency range frequency shift function Equation Function of Frequency Gaarder identically distributed impulse response independent Input Signal long codes matched filter Matched Receiver Response mean receiver output obtained peak-to peak-to-sidelobe ratio percentage of modulation percentages of scattered phase factors Radar Ambiguity Functions random variables real signal receiver output Equation receiving filter scattered energy scattering function selective fading signal x(t system performance time-selective fading time-variable attenuator tion transmitter and receiver waveform zero mean