The Global Challenge of Health Care Rationing
Angela Coulter, Christopher Ham
Open University Press, 2000 - Medical - 267 pages
Rationing or priority setting occurs in all health care systems. Doctors, managers, and politicians are involved in making decisions on how to use scarce resources and which groups and patients should receive priority. These decisions may be informed by the results of medical research and cost effectiveness studies but they also involve the use of judgement and experience. Consequently, priority setting involves ethics as well as economics and decisions on who should live and who should die remain controversial and contested.
This book seeks to illuminate the debate on priority setting by drawing on experience from around the world. The authors are all involved in priority setting, either as decision makers or researchers, and their contributions demonstrate in practical terms how different countries and disciplines are approaching the allocation of resources between competing claims. Accessible to general readers as well as specialists, The Global Challenge of Health Care Rationing summarizes the latest thinking in this area and provides a unique resource for those searching for a guide through the maze.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
what is holding us back
Developments in the Nordic countries goodbye to
Reactivation of the prioritization process in
14 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
accountability for reasonableness allocation Alzheimer's disease analysis approach basic basket benefit budget cancer cent challenge choices cholecystectomy cholesterol cisions clinical clinicians Committee concern context coronary heart disease cost cost-effectiveness coverage Daniels and Sabin Danish Council David Bowen debate decision makers developing countries disability disease disutility donepezil drug effective ensure equity ethical evidence evidence-based medicine example experience explicit rationing focus framework goal groups guidelines health authority health care rationing health care reform health care system health plans health services health technology assessment implicit important issues Jaymee's judgement legitimacy limits managed ment methods National Health National Health Service Nordic countries outcomes Pakistan physicians political politicians population principles priorities and rationing priority setting problems programme public involvement rationales regional boards requires responsibility scores setting priorities sickness funds sildenafil social somatostatin specific surgery techniques transparent treatment values Zealand