This is the first full-length critique of Quine's celebrated doctrine of the indeterminacy of translation. Kirk clarifies the central indeterminacy thesis doctrine--whose influence extends beyond the philosophy of language and the philosophy of mind, and presents a new argument against the indeterminacy doctrine, showing that the falsity of this doctrine leaves the other main tenets of Quine's philosophy of language intact.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
A CASE FOR INDETERMINACY
THE MAIN THESIS
The Case for Quines Doctrine
11 other sections not shown
accept actually analytical hypotheses assume assumption behavioural dispositions beliefs chapter Chinese claim compatible concede concepts conflict constraints count discussion disposed to assent dissent Duhem-Quine thesis Dummett empirically adequate equivalent exact translation example explicable expressions Gavagai given sentence grammar holism homophonic idea imply incompatible indeter indeterminacy doctrine indeterminacy of sentence indeterminacy of translation indeterminacy thesis inextricability thesis inscrutability of reference inscrutability thesis interpretation knowledge of meanings language lation linguists logical Marcia's Martian matter of fact metaphysical realism observation sentences ordinary notion permissible permutation theorem physical theory physically statable predicates principle propositional attitudes quark quark theory question Quine Quine-acceptable facts Quine's Quinean indeterminacy radical translation reason reject relevant rendering scheme of translation seems semantic sense sentence translation sort statements stimulus meanings strong inscrutability suggestion supposed synonymy tences things totality trans translation manual true truth values underdetermination utterances Wittgenstein Word and Object