Twenty-first Century Weapons Proliferation: Are We Ready?Leading US security practitioners fromt he Ford, Carter, Reagan, Bush and Clinton administrations, plus other experts on proliferation, clarify the weapons proliferation threats that the US and its allies will face, and suggest what new policies their governments should consider. |
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
Terrorism and Weapons of the Apocalypse | 14 |
Advanced Conventional | 33 |
HOW APPROPRIATE | 53 |
Beyond the Counterproliferation Initiative | 64 |
A Critical Appraisal | 72 |
Controlling Fissile Materials | 84 |
Why a Rich Democratic and Perhaps Peaceful Era Is | 99 |
Why the End of History and of | 135 |
A Democratic | 148 |
Proliferation Theory and Nonproliferation Practice | 168 |
Notes on Contributors | 182 |
Other editions - View all
Twenty-first Century Weapons Proliferation: Are We Ready? Henry D. Sokolski,James M. Ludes Limited preview - 2001 |
Twenty-First Century Weapons Proliferation: Are We Ready? James M. Ludes,Henry Sokolski Limited preview - 2014 |
Twenty-First Century Weapons Proliferation: Are We Ready? James M. Ludes,Henry Sokolski Limited preview - 2014 |
Common terms and phrases
Affairs Aires American Argentina arms Asia attack Aum Shinrikyo ballistic become biological weapons bomb Brazil building cent chemical and biological China civilian concern continue conventional cooperation counterproliferation countries Defense democracy democratic Department destruction East economic effects efforts Energy example experience export fact fissile material forces foreign fuel fundamentalist future groups growth important increase India initiative institutions interests International Iran Iraq Islam issues lead least less limit major March mass military missile Muslims nonproliferation North Korea nuclear nuclear weapons operations Pakistan peace plans plutonium political possible potential predictions Press problem production projection proliferation reactor regime regional relations Report require response result rule Russia scientists Security social South stockpiles strategic Studies Terrorism terrorist tests theory threats United University uranium Washington weapons York
References to this book
Historical Dictionary of Arms Control and Disarmament Jeffrey Arthur Larsen,James M. Smith Limited preview - 2005 |