Understanding Moral Weakness
This book considers the common human predicament that we often choose an action other than the one we perceive to be best. Philosophers know this problem as akrasia. The author develops a nuanced understanding of the nature and causes of akrasia by integrating the best insights of Socrates, Aristotle, Augustine, and Aquinas, and several contemporary philosophers.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
act akratically addiction adultery akrasia occurs akratic action akratic person akratic syllogism all-things-considered Aquinas’s argue Aristotle Aristotle on Practical Aristotle’s Aristotle’s Conception Augustine Augustine’s Axiology best judgment Chapter choose claim cognition compulsion conclusion considered judgment Davidson desire diachronic discussion distinction Donald Davidson drinking early Socrates Edith Hamilton Editors eudaimonism evil example exists explains false belief Gosling habitual action human IaIIae Ibid instances of akrasia intellect introspective evidence inverse akrasia later Socrates Let us suppose Medieval Thought mental milkshake mind minor premise moral knowledge moral weakness moral wisdom motivation Nicomachean Ethics non-rational one’s Penner perspective Phaedrus Plato pleasure practical syllogism practical wisdom premise Protagoras psychological hedonism Psychology of Action rational reason regard Saarinen sense situation Socratic Psychology sort soul strict akrasia subsystems Summa Theologiae synchronic akrasia synchronic belief akrasia Tenenbaum Thomas Aquinas true belief understanding volume in Philosophy volume in Studies weak akrasia William David Ross wrong