United Nations Peacekeeping in the Post-Cold War Era

Front Cover
Taylor & Francis, 2005 - Political Science - 228 pages
0 Reviews

This new study questions whether peacekeeping fundamentally changed between the Cold War and Post-Cold War periods.

Focusing on contrasting case studies of the Congo, Cyprus, Somalia and Angola, as well as more recent operations in Sierra Leone and East Timor, it probes new evidence with clarity and rigour.  

The authors conclude that most peacekeeping operations - whether in the Cold War or Post-Cold War periods - were flawed due to the failure of the UN member states to agree upon achievable objectives, the precise nature of the operations and provision of the necessary resources, and unrealistic post-1989 expectations that UN peacekeeping operations could be adapted to the changed international circumstances. The study concludes by looking at the Brahimi reforms, questions whether these are realistically achievable and looks at their impact on contemporary peace operations in Sierra Leone, East Timor and elsewhere.

 

What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.

Contents

Introduction
1
Peacekeeping in the Cold WarpostCold War
23
ONUC and the Congo 19601964
46
UNFICYP and Cyprus 1964
78
UNOSOM and Somalia 19921995
107
UNAVEM and Angola 19881997
139
lessons learnt?
169
The future of UN peacekeeping
192
Bibliography
209
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

About the author (2005)

John Terence O'Neill is a former Colonel in the Irish Defence Forces, who has served on UN missions in the Congo (1961), Lebanon (1982-83) and Angola (1993), and recently completed a PhD at Trinity College Dublin. Nicholas Rees is Dean of Graduate Studies and Jean Monnet Professor of European Institutions and International Relations at the University of Limerick. He is the co-author of Ireland's Poor Relations: Irish Foreign Policy Towards the Third World.

Bibliographic information