Universalism Vs. Relativism: Making Moral Judgments in a Changing, Pluralistic, and Threatening World
Don S. Browning
Rowman & Littlefield, 2006 - Philosophy - 189 pages
In formulating this collection, Don Browning asked his contributors to respond to a simple question: Has moral relativism run its course? The threats of terrorism, reproductive technology, and globalization have forced us to ask anew whether there are universal moral truths upon which to base political and ethical judgments. In this timely edited collection, distinguished scholars present and test the best answers to this question. This dialogue includes contributions from widely-recognized scholars Richard Bernstein, Amitai Etzioni, Jean Bethke Elshtain, William Galston, Franklin Gamwell, Timothy Jackson, James Turner Johnson, John Kelsay, and Jean Porter. Although the conflict between universalism and relativism is a complex issue with many parts, the contributors to this volume tackle the question at hand in an engaging, thought-provoking manner. These insightful responses temper the strong antithesis between universalism and relativism and retain sensitivity to how language and history shape the context of our moral decisions. This important and relevant work of contemporary political and social thought is ideal for use in the classroom across many disciplines including political science, philosophy, ethics, theology, and law.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Can We Justify Universal Moral Norms?
SelfEvident Truth Beyond Relativism
The Origin of Moral Norms
Approaches from Human Nature
Moral Ideals and Human Nature
Can We Justify Universal Moral Norms? Yes with Qualifications
Common Ground through Historical Understanding
Searching for Common Ground Ethical Traditions at the Interface with International Law
Universalism and Relativism Some Lessons from Gandhi
Concrete Levels of Being and Their Political Implications
About the Editor and Contributors
Christians Muslims and the Conduct of War
Other editions - View all
affirmation al-Qa'ida Amitai Etzioni appeal to self-evidence approach Arendt argue argument armed conflict basic Bernstein Christian clash of civilizations common ground consensus context criticism cultural customary law decision defined discourse distinction Don Browning ethical traditions fighting final vocabularies force forms foundationalism Galston Gamwell Gandhi Hannah Arendt historical human nature human rights idea ideals and norms identity immoral implies individual international law Islamic tradition James Turner Johnson jihad John Kelsay Justify Universal Moral Kant Kelsay killing kind law of armed least means metaphysical moral beliefs moral claims moral judgments moral sense Muslims natural law one's particular person perspectives philosophers pluralism political positive law possible practical question Qur'an rational reason reflection relativism religious response Rorty self-evident truths Shari'a social societies specific theory tion transcendental moral principle understanding Universal Moral Norms University Press Usama bin Ladin valid value pluralism values Western