Value Capture for Transportation Finance: Report to the Minnesota Legislature
Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, 2009 - Impact fees - 42 pages
As vehicles become more fuel-efficient and overall levels of travel stagnate in response to increases in fuel prices, conventional sources of revenue for transportation finance such as taxes on motor fuels have been put under increasing pressure. One potential alternative as a source of revenue is a set of policies collectively referred to as value capture policies. In contrast to fuel taxes and other instruments that impose charges on users of transportation networks, value capture policies seek to generate revenue by extracting a portion of the gains in the value of land that result from improvements to transportation networks. In this report we identify a set of eight policies that contain elements of the value capture approach. These policies include land value taxes, tax increment financing, special assessments, transportation utility fees, development impact fees, negotiated exactions, joint development, and air rights. We evaluate each of the policies according to four criteria: (1) efficiency, which relates to how well the policies allocate scarce resources, (2) equity, which describes the fairness of resource allocation among different strata of society, (3) sustainability, which refers to the ability of the policy to serve as an adequate, reliable source of transportation revenue, and (4) feasibility, which refers to the degree of political and administrative difficulty associated with each policy. Since these policies are targeted toward use at the state and local level in Minnesota, we conclude by examining some legal and administrative issues related to the implementation of each policy with special reference to Minnesota.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
The Need for Alternative Transportation Revenue Sources
ability-to-pay administrative adoption air rights development allocate applied authorized base beneficiaries benefit principle benefits received Center for Transportation charges cities contributions create criteria development impact fees economic development economic efficiency ensure established evaluate existing residents fund growth highways Humphrey Institute implementation income increases Institute of Public JD arrangements joint development jurisdictions land value taxes landowners lease levied light rail limited locations ment Minnesota Legislature negotiated exactions off-site politically feasible portation potential private sector property owners property value public transit rates rational nexus require revenue for transportation source of revenue special assessment districts split-rate property tax streetcar tax increment financing TIF districts tion transit station transportation benefits transportation facility transportation finance transportation improvement transportation infrastructure transportation networks transportation purposes transportation services Transportation Studies transportation utility fees types typically University of Minnesota users of transportation value capture policies value creation value gains