What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
SITDOWNS SLOWDOWNS AND THE NARROWING OF FEDERAL PROTECTION
THE DEFINITION OF EMPLOYEES REAL INTERESTS THE CONTINUITY OF LEGAL VALUES
STATUS ASSUMPTIONS AND THE COMMON ENTERPRISE
MANAGERIAL CONTROL AND THE FEAR OF ANARCHY
THE SCOPE OF MANDATORY BARGAINING
VALUATION IN OTHER GUISES EMPLOYER RESPONSES TO COLLECTIVE ACTION
THE BARGAINING ENIGMA THEORIES AND REALITIES
THE INTEREST IN THE MOBILITY OF CAPITAL THE EXPLICIT USE OF UNDERLYING PREMISES
CONCLUSION THE EMPLOYMENT RELATION AND THE PREMISES OF LABOR LAW
Other editions - View all
action agerial American arbitration argued assumptions Atleson attempt basic Board capital collective bargaining concern concerted activity conflict contract created Darlington decisions deemed define despite discharge dispute doctrine E. P. Thompson economic effect employees employment exist federal Fibreboard hire Howard Johnson impact industrial inherent instance interests involved issue judicial Karl Klare Klare labor law labor power language legislative history limited Mackay mandatory bargaining matters ment Moreover National Labor Board National Labor Relations Nevertheless NLRA NLRB nomic Norris-LaGuardia Act notion obligations organization permanent replacement picket line ployees production protected recognized refused reinstatement relationship restrictions result right to strike rules Section seems sitdown situation slowdowns social status stressed strikers suggests supra note Supreme Court Taft-Hartley Act tion tive unfair labor practice union unprotected values violation wages Wagner Act wildcat Wiley workers workplace
Page 31 - The inequality of bargaining power between employees who do not possess full freedom of association or actual liberty of contract, and employers who are organized in the corporate or other forms of ownership association...
Page 26 - That employees shall have the right to organize and bargain collectively through representatives of their own choosing, and shall be free from the interference, restraint, or coercion of employers of labor, or their agents, in the designation of such representatives or in self-organization or in other concerted activities for the purpose of collective bargaining or other mutual aid or protection...
Page 12 - Nothing in this Act, except as specifically provided for herein, shall be construed so as either to interfere with or impede or diminish in any way the right to strike, or to affect the limitations or qualifications on that right.
Page 9 - ... it does not follow that an employer, guilty of no act denounced by the statute, has lost the right to protect and continue his business by supplying places left vacant by strikers. And he is not bound to discharge those hired to fill the places of strikers, upon the election of the latter to resume their employment, in order to create places for them.