We the People, Volume 2: Transformations
Constitutional change, seemingly so orderly, formal, and refined, has in fact been a revolutionary process from the first, as Bruce Ackerman makes clear in We the People, Volume 2: Transformations. The Founding Fathers, hardly the genteel conservatives of myth, set America on a remarkable course of revolutionary disruption and constitutional creativity that endures to this day. After the bloody sacrifices of the Civil War, Abraham Lincoln and the Republican Party revolutionized the traditional system of constitutional amendment as they put principles of liberty and equality into higher law. Another wrenching transformation occurred during the Great Depression, when Franklin Roosevelt and his New Dealers vindicated a new vision of activist government against an assault by the Supreme Court. These are the crucial episodes in American constitutional history that Ackerman takes up in this second volume of a trilogy hailed as “one of the most important contributions to American constitutional thought in the last half-century” (Cass Sunstein, The New Republic). In each case he shows how the American people—whether led by the Founding Federalists or the Lincoln Republicans or the Roosevelt Democrats—have confronted the Constitution in its moments of great crisis with dramatic acts of upheaval, always in the name of popular sovereignty. A thoroughly new way of understanding constitutional development, We the People, Volume 2: Transformations reveals how America’s “dualist democracy” provides for these populist upheavals that amend the Constitution, often without formalities. The book also sets contemporary events, such as the Reagan Revolution and Roe v. Wade, in deeper constitutional perspective. In this context Ackerman exposes basic constitutional problems inherited from the New Deal Revolution and exacerbated by the Reagan Revolution, then considers the fundamental reforms that might resolve them. A bold challenge to formalist and fundamentalist views, this volume demonstrates that ongoing struggle over America’s national identity, rather than consensus, marks its constitutional history.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
activist afªrmative American ªnal ªnally ªnd Andrew Johnson Anti-Federalists ªrst Article Five Articles of Confederation authority ªve bandwagon Bruce Ackerman campaign Carolina challenge Civil claim conªrmed confront Congress Congressional conservative consolidation constitutional amendment Continental Congress convention Convention/Congress court-packing crisis Deal Dealers deªned debate decision delegates Democrats difªculty effort election electoral federal Federalists formal Fourteenth Amendment fundamental gain higher lawmaking House hypertextualist impeachment initiative institutional judicial Justices lawyers legalistic legislation legislatures Lincoln Madison majority mandate ment North Carolina ofªce ofªcial opinion party Philadelphia Philadelphia Convention political popular sovereignty precedent President Presidential leadership principles problem proclamation proposal question radical ratiªcation ratifying recognized Reconstruction Act Reconstruction amendments rejected Republic Republicans revolution revolutionary reform role Roosevelt Senate Seward signiªcance South Southern statute struggle supra Supreme Court switch Thirteenth Amendment tion tional traditional triggering unconventional Union United veto victory vote voters Wheeler