Well-being for Public Policy
In this volume, the authors explain the reasons why subjective indicators of well-being are needed. They describe how these indicators can offer useful input and provide examples of policy uses of well-being measures. The book then delves into objections to the use of subjective well-being indicators for policy purposes and discusses why these objections are not warranted. Finally, the book contains answers pertaining to the measures that are currently in use and describes the types of measures that are most likely to be valuable in the policy domain.
At the most ambitious, even audacious, level, Well-Being for Public Policy has the potential of transforming society by making people and policy more concerned about well-being, and less concerned about economics and income. The existence of national measures of well-being would draw more interest to the rewarding and problem areas of life, and serve to give a broader focus to societal decisions. National accounts of well-being could reorient societies so that social values, the environment, enjoyable work, and physical and emotional health are given prominence along with economic development. This book is an invaluable treatise on current understanding of the complex relationship between well-being and public policy-- it will be of great interest to researchers in the fields of psychology and economics.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Using WellBeing to Inform Public Policy
How WellBeing Adds Information
4 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
accounts of well-being adaptation additional aircraft noise areas assess associated average behavior caregivers changes circumstances commuting concerns construct content validity convergent validity correlation cross-sectional studies definition of well-being Diener discriminant validity economic economists effects evaluate evidence examined example existing experience factors feelings Furthermore German Socio-Economic Panel goals groups GSOEP guide policy happiness Helliwell impact important Importantly income increase indicators of well-being individuals instance job satisfaction levels of well-being lives Lucas measure well-being measures of well-being meta-analysis national accounts national indicators negative noise objective outcomes overall panel studies people's person policy decisions policy makers Positive Psychology predict problems programs psychological questions rates reflect relatively reliability reported response revealed preference sample Schimmack scores social capital social comparison social indicators society specific standard gamble subjective definition subjective measures suggests suicide survey systematic tion underlying unemployment validity variance