What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Rule 80317Market Reports
12 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
85:1 regarding Fed 90:1 regarding Fed 98:1 regarding admitted adoption adverse party attacking and supporting authentication or identification availability of declarant Bergman and Hollander circumstances Code comparable to Fed Criminal Evidence 15th cross-examination Dakota declarant immaterial declarant is available declarant’s defendant defendant’s deﬁned differs from Fed dying declaration examples of authentication excluded expert witness family history federal rule ﬁnds following are examples former testimony guarantees of trustworthiness handwriting Hearsay exceptions hearsay rule hearsay statement hearsay within hearsay identical to Fed identiﬁcation identification conforming illustration IMMATERIAL The following impeachment impending death inadmissible judgment KeyCite lack of memory learned treatises marriage ment nolo contendere Ohio personal or family prior proceeding prosecution redirect examination Reputation concerning requirement of authentication residual exception rule differs rule is essentially rule is identical rule or statute Section South Dakota Stat statute differs supporting credibility testiﬁed tion trial court unavailable victim Wharton’s Criminal Evidence