Where the Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion, and NaturalismThis book is a long-awaited major statement by a pre-eminent analytic philosopher, Alvin Plantinga, on one of our biggest debates -- the compatibility of science and religion. The last twenty years has seen a cottage industry of books on this divide, but with little consensus emerging. Plantinga, as a top philosopher but also a proponent of the rationality of religious belief, has a unique contribution to make. His theme in this short book is that the conflict between science and theistic religion is actually superficial, and that at a deeper level they are in concord. Plantinga examines where this conflict is supposed to exist -- evolution, evolutionary psychology, analysis of scripture, scientific study of religion -- as well as claims by Dan Dennett, Richard Dawkins, and Philip Kitcher that evolution and theistic belief cannot co-exist. Plantinga makes a case that their arguments are not only inconclusive but that the supposed conflicts themselves are superficial, due to the methodological naturalism used by science. On the other hand, science can actually offer support to theistic doctrines, and Plantinga uses the notion of biological and cosmological "fine-tuning" in support of this idea. Plantinga argues that we might think about arguments in science and religion in a new way -- as different forms of discourse that try to persuade people to look at questions from a perspective such that they can see that something is true. In this way, there is a deep and massive consonance between theism and the scientific enterprise. |
Other editions - View all
Where the Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion, and Naturalism Alvin Plantinga Limited preview - 2011 |
Where the Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion, and Naturalism Alvin Plantinga Limited preview - 2011 |
Where the Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion, and Naturalism Alvin Plantinga No preview available - 2012 |
Common terms and phrases
according acting specially Aquinas argue behavior Behe Behe’s Biblical Blind Watchmaker causally closed cause chapter Christian belief claim classical science cognitive faculties complex conclusion conflict contemporary course created creatures Daniel Dennett Darwin’s Darwin’s Dangerous Idea Darwinian Dawkins defeater Dennett design beliefs design discourse doesn’t Edge of Evolution Elliott Sober epistemic evidence base evolution evolutionary psychology example existence explanation fact faculties are reliable false given God’s goes hence human improbable intelligent designer intervention involved irreducible complexity isn’t Jesus materialism mathematics miracles mutation natural laws natural selection naturalist NP properties objects Oxford University Press perhaps Peter van Inwagen Philosophy physical possible worlds probability problem produced proposition quantum mechanics question rational reason reductive materialism relevant religious belief respect Richard Dawkins scientific theory Simonian science sort special divine action structures supernatural suppose theism theistic belief theistic religion Theology things thought tion true beliefs York