Whistleblowing in Biomedical Research: Policies and Procedures for Responding to Reports of Misconduct : Proceedings of a Workshop, September 21-22, 1981
The Commission, 1981 - Human experimentation in medicine - 208 pages
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
academic accused action activity addition administrative agencies allegations application appropriate Association authority autonomy behavior believe biomedical charges clinical committee complaints concerned conduct consent continuing deal decision determine discussion effective employees established ethical example existing fact faculty federal formal fraud functions funding given grant Health hearing hospital human subjects important individual institution interest internal investigation involved issues judgment least licensing mechanisms medicine misconduct monitoring moral norms obligation organization particular patients persons physicians practice problems procedures professional Professor protection protocols question reasons receive regulations responsibility risks role rules scientific scientific community scientists seems social society staff standards structure suggest supra things tion values violations whistle whistleblower