Whose Science? Whose Knowledge?: Thinking from Women's Lives
Sandra Harding here develops further the themes first addressed in her widely influential book, The Science Question in Feminism, and conducts a compelling analysis of feminist theories on the philosophical problem of how we know what we know. Following a strong narrative line, Harding sets out her arguments in highly readable prose. In Part 1, she discusses issues that will interest anyone concerned with the social bases of scientific knowledge. In Part 2, she modifies some of her views and then pursues the many issues raised by the feminist position which holds that women's social experience provides a unique vantage point for discovering masculine bias and and questioning conventional claims about nature and social life. In Part 3, Harding looks at the insights that people of color, male feminists, lesbians, and others can bring to these controversies, and concludes by outlining a feminist approach to science in which these insights are central. "Women and men cannot understand or explain the world we live in or the real choices we have," she writes, "as long as the sciences describe and explain the world primarily from the perspectives of the lives of the dominant groups." Harding's is a richly informed, radical voice that boldly confronts issues of crucial importance to the future of many academic disciplines. Her book will amply reward readers looking to achieve a more fruitful understanding of the relations between feminism, science, and social life.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
After the Science Question in Feminism
Reform and Transformation
Why Physics Is a Bad Model for Physics
Epistemology 5 What Is Feminist Epistemology?
Strong Objectivity and Socially Situated Knowledge
Feminist Epistemology in and after the Enlightenment
Other editions - View all
activities African American agendas analyses androcentric Anne Fausto-Sterling appear argue argument assumptions bad science Bettina Aptheker biology causal Chapter claims conceptual consequences conventional critiques culture discussions dominant groups Donna Haraway empiricism ence Eurocentric European American Evelyn Fox Keller experience explain female femi feminist empiricism feminist research feminist science feminist standpoint theory feminist theory feminist thought heterosexual human important institutions intellectual issues kinds lesbian lives liberatory logic male men's modern science Nancy Hartsock natural sciences nature and social nist objectivity oppression partial and distorted Patricia Hill Collins perspective Philosophy Postmodernism postmodernist problem projects racism relativism Sandra Harding science and technology Science Question science-as-usual scientific sexist sexuality social relations social sciences society sociology standpoint theory strong programme struggles studies tendencies theorists Third World descent tion understand University Press West Western science woman women of color women scientists women's lives women's movement York