Why I Am Not A(n)
A take-off from Bertrand Russell's 'Why I Am Not A Christian' that focuses not just on Christian dogma but on all dogmas looking at the premises that comprise dogmatic belief with its psycho-emotional grip upon mankind. "There are many methods or techniques a thief may use to carry out his thievery. This work will take a look at just one method, which I believe to be the most deceiving and the most prevalent of all methods, in which thievery is attempted, this method is carried out through the use of dogma by a group." Why I Am Not A(n): Author Bio: Christopher Alan Anderson (1950 - ) received the basis of his education from the University of Science and Philosophy, Swannanoa, Waynesboro, Virginia. He resides in the transcendental/romantic tradition, that vein of spiritual creativity of the philosopher and poet. His quest has been to define and express an eternal romantic reality from which a man and a woman could together stand in their difference and create a living universe of procreative love. Mr. Anderson began these writings in 1971. The first writings were published in 1985. On a personal note, when Mr. Anderson was asked to describe the writings and what he felt their message was he responded, "Spiritual procreation. Mankind has yet to distinguish the two sexes on the spiritual level. In this failure lies the root of our problems and why we cannot yet touch the eternal together. The message of man and woman balance brings each of us together in love with our eternal other half right now." keywords: Dogma, Ideology, Group, Vested-Interest, Free Lunch, The Con...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
action actual value another’s production belief he holds belief‐before‐deed criterion beliefin bring Centerfor the Universe Christian Christopher Alan Anderson conception we hold considered worthy consume criterion of value crusade dogma resides dogma serves emotional experience endeavor entity equates his value essence Essential Mispremise existent requirement forced reception free lunch Free‐Lunch God fundamentally future promise Game Exposed give handle the existent hierarchy identity threat Ifwe individual intrinsic Let us realize male and female man’s Marxist master/slave Muslim nature of existence necessary ofthe group ofthe value ofthievery one’s identity one’s mind oneself and one’s ourselves people’s position productive deed productive effort psychotic reaction reality rebirth regardless ofthe region in one’s requirement of production salvation scenario self‐meaning self‐other balance self‐other relationship sexual dogma something‐for‐nothing special privilege submit tangible value thief claims thief is attempting thievery told to pay transaction value creation value to exchange Vested‐Interest Belief Woman Balance Woman Relationship