Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Courts, Civil Liberties, and the Administration of Justice of ... , 93-2, Apr. 24, 26 and 29, 1974
1974 - 275 sider
Hva folk mener - Skriv en omtale
Vi har ikke funnet noen omtaler på noen av de vanlige stedene.
abuses activities administration agencies agents American application approval Assistant Attorney authorized believe bill calls Chairman citizens civil committee communications concerned conducted Congress consent constitutional conversations court court order crime criminal Defense Department device Directive disclosure DRINAN eavesdropping effect electronic surveillance evidence example fact Federal foreign foreign power Fourth Amendment hearings House individual installed intelligence interception involved issue judge Justice KASTENMEIER kind law enforcement legislation limited Long matter means ment MILLER monitoring national security necessary obtained operations organized parties period person PETERSEN practice present President probable cause problem procedures proposed prosecution protect question reason record relating request Senator situation specific statement subcommittee System talking taps telephone testimony tion Title III United violation warrant warrantless wire wiretap
Side 254 - ... no person not being authorized by the sender shall intercept any communication and divulge or publish the existence, contents, substance, purport, effect, or meaning of such intercepted communication to any person...
Side 40 - Constitution, independent tribunals of justice will consider themselves in a peculiar manner the guardians of those rights ; they will be an impenetrable bulwark against every assumption of power in the Legislative or Executive ; they will be naturally led to resist every encroachment upon rights expressly stipulated for in the Constitution by the declaration of rights.
Side 18 - To protect that right, every unjustifiable intrusion by the Government upon the privacy of the individual, whatever the means employed, must be deemed a violation of the Fourth Amendment.
Side 154 - USC 605) shall limit the constitutional power of the President to take such measure as he deems necessary to protect the Nation against actual or potential attack or other hostile acts of a foreign power, to obtain foreign intelligence information deemed essential to the security of the United States, or to protect national security information against foreign intelligence activities.
Side 14 - ... in any trial, hearing, or other proceeding in or before any court, grand jury, department, officer, agency, regulatory body, legislative committee, or other authority of the United States, a State, or a political subdivision thereof if the disclosure of that information would be in violation of this chapter.
Side 37 - The requirement that warrants shall particularly describe the things to be seized makes general searches under them impossible and prevents the seizure of one thing under a warrant describing another. As to what is to be taken, nothing is left to the discretion of the officer executing the warrant.
Side 14 - Every order and extension thereof shall contain a provision that the authorization to intercept shall be executed as soon as practicable, shall be conducted in such a way as to minimize the interception of communications not otherwise subject to interception under this chapter, and must terminate upon attainment of the authorized objective, or in any event in thirty days.
Side 260 - ... (a) actual damages but not less than liquidated damages computed at the rate of $100 a day for each day of violation or $1,000, whichever is higher; (b) punitive damages; and (c) a reasonable attorney's fee and other litigation costs reasonably incurred.
Side 4 - Board, its member, agent, or agency, there to produce evidence if so ordered, or there to give testimony touching the matter under investigation or in question; and any failure to obey such order of the court may be punished by said court as a contempt thereof.