Young Children's Naive Thinking about the Biological World
Presents research on the topic of young children's naive biology, examining such theoretical issues as processes, conditions and mechanisms in conceptual development using the development of biological understanding as the target case.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
The LivingNonliving Distinction
Personification as Analogy in Biological Understanding
The Distinction Between Biological
Chapter O Construction of Naive Biology Under Cognitive
5-year-olds acquired acquisition of naive activities animals and plants animate/inanimate artifacts behaviors belief revision biological knowledge biological phenomena biological understanding bodily phenomena bodily processes Carey category-based causal devices causal explanations Chapter chil child children's biological children's naive biology claim cognitive commonalities between animals conceptual change conceptual development context core domains cultural differentiate dren eating entities example experiment Gelman germs goldfish Gutheil Inagaki & Hatano Inagaki and Hatano inductive projection infants inference innate constraints interpretation Keil knowledge about humans knowledge systems lay adults living things mechanical causality mental properties metacognitive monalities naive psychology naive theories nonhuman nonliving things nutriment patterns person analogy personification photosynthesis Piaget pieces of knowledge predictions preschool preschool children questions reasoning recognize referred rely sality similar sociocultural constraints specific spontaneous squirrel studies target object Taro teleology tion tulip vital power vitalistic causality vitalistic explanations Wellman whereas Williams syndrome young children young children's naive
Page 209 - Inagaki, K., & Hatano, G. (1991) Constrained person analogy in young children's biological inference. Cognitive Development, 6, 219-231. Inagaki, K., & Hatano, G. (1993). Young children's understanding of the mind-body distinction. Child Development, 64, 1534-1549. Inagaki, K., & Hatano, G.
Page 206 - Coley, JD, Medin, DL, Proffitt, JB, Lynch, E., & Atran, S. (1999). Inductive reasoning in folkbiological thought. In DL Medin & S. Atran (Eds.), Folkbiology (pp. 205-232). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Page 210 - Preschoolers' understanding of germs as invisible mechanisms. Cognitive Development, 11, 83-106. Kalish, CW (1997). Preschoolers' understanding of mental and bodily reactions to contamination: What you don't see can hurt you, but cannot sadden you.