## Zeno's Paradox: Unraveling the Ancient Mystery Behind the Science of Space and TimeThe fascinating story of an ancient riddle?and what it reveals about the nature of time and space Three millennia ago, the Greek philosopher Zeno constructed a series of logical paradoxes to prove that motion is impossible. Today, these paradoxes remain on the cutting edge of our investigations into the fabric of space and time. Zeno?s Paradox uses the motion paradox as a jumping-off point for an exploration of the twenty-five-hundred-year quest to uncover the true nature of the universe. From Galileo to Einstein to Stephen Hawking, some of the greatest minds in history have tackled the problem and made spectacular breakthroughs?but through it all, the paradox of motion remains. |

### What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.

### Other editions - View all

### Common terms and phrases

acceleration Achilles algebra answer apple argued argument Aristotle Aristotle’s arrow atoms body Calabi-Yau manifold calculus circle clock continuous curve Descartes Descartes’s dichotomy paradox dimensions dimples distance traveled earth Einstein electromagnetic waves electrons energy equal equations ether Euclidean experiment falling feet finite force Galileo geometry Greek happen idea imagine infinitesimal instant interval intuition invented inverse-square law Joseph Mazur Kepler Leibniz magnetic Marlboro College mass mathematical mathematician Maxwell’s mean measure Merton Michelson moon motion movement moving object nature Newton number line observation orbit oscillation Parmenides particles pendulum pentagon philosophy physicist physics Planck’s constant planets Plato’s position problem pull Pythagorean Pythagorean theorem quantum mechanics question ratio rational numbers real numbers relativity represent rotating sense space space-time special relativity speed of light square stationary string theory theorem things thought Tycho universal gravitation velocity vibrating weight wrote Zeno Zeno’s paradoxes