15 pages matching libel in this book
Results 1-3 of 15
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
RESEARCH CONTEXT Page
3 other sections not shown
Advertising affair with Marcie ambiguous message ANOVA asked belief biased calculated according cheating Cohen communication Comparison Confident Very Confident context convey the impression convict the target dedicated researcher direction Scenario discussion Doctor of Philosophy Edward enhanced estimate evaluate example extremely lucky tonight factor Federal Trade Commission following formula formula using means four scenarios Frequency Percent future research group-comparison t-test Hypothesis Implications interpersonal messages Judgment of Target's jurors jury libel Mason mass media means obtained media message message target motive information negative alternative newspaper obscenity optimism bias overhears the remark perceived poker prediction Probability+ question regarding target's remark and says respondents Santa Clara County says Phil says Ralph self-different-from-other bias Self-Other Bias Replication self-over-other self-serving bias Sigma2 Social Psychology speaker intent speaker motive speaker was seen Spiral of Silence Stanford stole someone's design subjects Target Speaks target's guilt tended tendency to convict Third-Person Effect want his remark Yes Yes