The Difficulty of Tolerance: Essays in Political Philosophy
These essays in political philosophy by T.M. Scanlon, written between 1969 and 1999, examine the standards by which social and political institutions should be justified and appraised. Scanlon explains how the powers of just institutions are limited by rights such as freedom of expression, and considers why these limits should be respected even when it seems that better results could be achieved by violating them. Other topics which are explored include voluntariness and consent, freedom of expression, tolerance, punishment, and human rights. The collection includes the classic essays 'Preference and Urgency', 'A Theory of Freedom of Expression', and 'Contractualism and Utilitarianism', as well as a number of other essays that have hitherto not been easily accessible. It will be essential reading for all those studying these topics from the perspective of political philosophy, politics, and law.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
A theory of freedom of expression
Rights goals and fairness
Preference and urgency
Freedom of expression and categories of expression
Human rights as a neutral concern
Contractualism and utilitarianism
Content regulation reconsidered
Other editions - View all
accept action acts agreement allow alternative answer appeal apply argue argument audience authority avoid balancing basis believe benefits called certain choice citizens claim clear concerned consequences consider considerations constitute contract costs decisions depends described desire discussion distribution due process effect equality example expectation fact fairness force freedom of expression give given grounds harms idea important individual institutions interests involve judgment justification kind least limits lives loss matter means moral nature notion objection obligation offer one's participant particular perhaps person philosophical political position possible preferences present principle problem promise protection punishment question rational reason regulation reject relevant restrictions result role rules seems sense simply social society substantive suggested theory things tolerance University utilitarianism violations voluntary well-being wrong