What Can Philosophy Contribute To Ethics?
Ethics appears early in the life of a culture. It is not the creation of philosophers. Many philosophers today think that their job is to take the ethics of their society in hand, analyse it into parts, purge the bad ideas, and organize the good into a systematic moral theory. The philosophers' ethics that results is likely to be very different from the culture's raw ethics and, they think, being better, should replace it. But few of us, even among philosophers, settle real-life moral questions by consulting the Categorical Imperative or the Principle of Utility, largely because, if we do, we often do not trust the outcome or cannot even reliably enough decide what it is. By contrast, James Griffin explores the question what philosophers can reasonably expect to contribute to normative ethics or to the ethics of a culture. Griffin argues that moral philosophers must tailor their work to what ordinary humans' motivational capabilities, and he offers a new account of moral deliberation.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
abstract agents Ajax altruism answer Aristotle Aristotle’s behaviour Bentham Bernard Williams calculations Cambridge claim Clarendon Press Cognitive conclusion consequentialism consequentialist David Hume deliberately kill desire dignity dispositions Dudley and Stephens empirical Essays ethical norms euthanasia evolutionary psychology example facts foundational principle Homeric ethics human capacities human interests human motivation human nature human rights Hume Hume’s ideal impartiality implies innate Jeremy Bentham John Rawls justice justify Kant Kant’s kill the innocent kind knowledge light on ethics limits of human lives metaethics moral considerations moral norms moral philosophers Neuroscience Newton normative agency normative ethics one’s Oxford University Press pain partiality perhaps Periclean person plausible practical principle of equality prohibition prudential values question rational reason relevant requires respect sect seems sense society Sophocles sort Stephen Stich surgeon’s systematic torture Treatise understanding Value Judgement Voltaire W. D. Ross wellbeing Williams’s word