The Triumph of Practice Over Theory in Ethics
Aristotelian ethics, Kantian ethics, and utilitarian ethics have been for some time now the main options within (Western) ethics, and the central task over the years has been to determine which of the three is right. Is this book yet another attempt to fulfill this same old task? Not at all. Sterba argues that in their ongoing attempts to put forward for general consideration the most morally defensible versions of their views, advocates of Aristotelian ethics, Kantian ethics, and utilitarian ethics have jettisoned much of what had originally distinguished their theories from each other. The upshot is that, in their current most morally defensible formulations, Aristotelian ethics, Kantian ethics, and utilitarian ethics no longer differ in the practical requirements they endorse. This makes the resolution of moral problems far easier. Sterba drives home his claims by taking up some of the most challenging and important moral problems of our time--sexual harassment, affirmative action, and international terrorism and Iraqi War II. This book is an ideal supplementary text for courses in introductory ethics, history of ethics, contemporary moral problems, and various applied ethics courses. Featuring a lucid writing style and coverage of current moral issues, it is also captivating reading for general readers.
49 pages matching argument in this book
Results 1-3 of 49
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Aristotelians and Kantians and the Justification
Kantians and Utilitarians and the Poor
Kantians and Utilitarians and the Moral Status
5 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
accept affirmative action African Americans aggression Androgyny animals argued argument Aristotelian ethical Aristotelians and Kantians Aristotle basic needs benefit bombing chapter claim course defense of morality diversity egoism endorse equal opportunity ethical theories example favor harm Human Preservation impose interests intrinsic value Iraq Iraqi Israeli John Rawls just-war Justice justified Kant's Kantian Law School libertarians liberty mass destruction military moral reasons moral status Morality as Compromise morally defensible morally required non-question-begging nonanthropocentrism nonbasic needs nonsentient living nuclear weapons objection Palestinian past discrimination percent personal flourishing Peter Singer philosophy poor Principle of Human priority over conflicting Qaeda racial rational Rawls reasons have priority recognize remedial affirmative action resolution rich right to welfare sacrifice Saddam Hussein self-interested and altruistic sentient sexual harassment simply Singer society Supreme Court terrorism things being equal Tibor Machan tion U.S. Supreme Court United University Press unreasonable utilitarian weapons of mass welfare liberal women York