In this short work, Dr. Szasz takes aim at conventional psychiatry, and at the attendent system of courts, hospitals, and psychiatrists who confine patients against their will. The focal point is a Supreme Court case involving a man forcibly committed to a Florida asylum for 14 years. In refuting the widely held notion that the Donaldson case represents an advancement in the rights of mental patients, Dr. Szasz has put the American legal establishments on trial.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
ACLU actually American Psychiatric Association amicus curiae attorneys Bazelon believe brief for O'Connor Bruce Ennis chiatric chiatrists Christian Scientist civil commitment claims confinement constitutional right Court of Appeals crime cured damages dangerous declared defense deprived diagnoses doctors Donald Donaldson decision Doubleday Anchor Ennis fact Florida State Hospital freedom Friedman Health Law Project human Ibid individual insanity defense institutional psychiatry interventions involun involuntary commitment involuntary mental hospitalization involuntary mental patients involuntary patients involuntary psychiatry involuntary treatment issue judge judgment judicial justification Karl Menninger Kenneth Donaldson legal champions ment Mental Health Law mentally ill MHLP MHLP's moral nondangerous official opinion Outpatient commitment paranoid schizophrenia person prison problem psychia psychiatric coercion Psychiatric Justice psychiatric reform psychiatric slavery psychiatric treatment reason release responsible right to treat right to treatment rights of mental ruling schizophrenia slave social society Supreme Court Szasz therapeutic therapy tients tion victims voluntary York